MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2600297793

Regulation of Antimicrobial Peptides in Human Endocervical Epithelial Cells by IL-1β, Endotoxin and Vitamin D.

2014· article· en· W2600297793 on OpenAlexaff
Evonne Chin-Smith, Rachel M. Tribe

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPediatric health and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntimicrobial peptidesCathelicidinAntimicrobialMicrobiologyImmunologyReproductive medicineMedicineBiologyInternal medicineChemistryPregnancy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), including trappin-2/elafin and cathelicidin, are a first line defense peptides released from epithelial cells in response to pathogens. Vit D also plays an integral role in the acquired and innate immune responses and a correlation between Vit D deficiency and infection is well established. However, the cellular impact of Vit D on AMPs in the reproductive tract has not been fully defined. We hypothesize that pregnant women at risk of SPTB express altered AMPs profiles and that this may be linked to Vit D deficiency and existing inflammation/infection. The aim of this study was to describe AMP expression in a human endocervical cell line (END1/E6E7) and determine the impact of Vit D in the presence and absence of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β and the bacterial product LPS on AMP profiles. METHODS: END1/E6E7 cells were cultured to ∼80% confluence and assessed for AMP (elafin, hBD2, SLPI, cathelicidin) mRNA expression by qPCR. Cells were treated ± 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (Vit D), IL-1β or LPS or with IL-1β/ LPS pre-treatment followed by Vit D. Cell culture supernatants were assessed for AMP protein expression by ELISA (normalised to whole cell protein). AMP mRNA copy number was normalised to GAPDH. Data was analysed using Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U test for individual comparisons (significance taken as P<0.05; all treatment groups n=6). RESULTS: All AMPs were expressed in unstimulated END1/E6E7. Basal expression of SLPI and elafin mRNA was relatively high (mean copy number ± SEM; SLPI: 2183666 ± 417498; elafin: 2612389 ± 328253); hBD2 and cathelicidin had low mRNA expression (hBD2: 1318 ± 239; cathelicidin: 1505 ± 158). IL-β increased elafin and hBD2 mRNA (196± 14%; 577± 149%, P<0.01) and protein (239 ± 23%; 1374 ± 167%, P<0.01) expression from basal levels as did LPS (P<0.01). Neither IL-1β nor LPS had any effect on SLPI or cathelicidin. Vit D did not alter elafin, SLPI or hBD2 expression but enhanced cathelicidin mRNA and protein expression (P<0.01 and P<0.05 respectively). Vit D also increased cathelicidin mRNA and protein expression in cells pre-treated with IL-1β or LPS (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: AMPs were differentially stimulated by inflammation and Vit D in END1 cells. Further investigation into the specific functional roles of the AMPS in this system and the potential for Vit D treatment to enhance cathelicidin defenses against pathogens is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicPediatric health and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207