MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

9-07: Feasibility of Extravascular Pacing with a Novel Substernal Electrode Configuration: Results from the Multi-center Substernal Pacing Acute Clinical Evaluation (SPACE) Trial

2016· article· en· W2600664832 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Darius P. Sholevar, Stanley Tung, Vikas Kuriachan, Peter Leong‐Sit, Henri Roukoz, Gregory Engel, Steven P. Kutalek, Devender Akula, Melissa Christie, Marina Ostanniy, Amy Thompson, Franck Molin

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentricleFluoroscopyCoronary sinusCardiac pacingPercutaneousDefibrillationCatheterImplantCardiologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Subcutaneous defibrillators offer a viable alternative to intravascular transvenous defibrillators. However, because of extra-thoracic lead placement, this system is limited by high defibrillation thresholds and an inability to deliver anti-tachycardia pacing. The SPACE trial evaluated the feasibility of cardiac pacing from an extra-vascular substernal space. Method: This prospective feasibility study enrolled adult patients (pts) undergoing midline sternotomy surgery or S-ICD implant. The primary endpoint was to assess the feasibility of pacing through a decapolar EP catheter (Marinr, 7F, Medtronic) temporarily placed via percutaneous subxiphoid access into the mediastinal tissues under the sternum at or adjacent to the midline. Using fluoroscopy and a malleable tunneling tool and introducer, the middle pair of electrodes was centered over the right ventricle. Pacing capture data in 7 vectors (3 bipolar and 4 unipolar) were collected with constant current pacing up to 20 mA and pulse-width (PW) up to 10 ms. Summary of Results: Twenty-six pts (21 males, 5 females; age 64.4 ± 10.0 years) were studied at 8 sites in the US and Canada. Parent procedures included one S-ICD implantation and 25 cardiothoracic surgeries. Catheter placement was accomplished in all 26 pts (mean placement time = 11.7 ± 10.1 minutes). Eighteen out of 26 pts had successful, consistent ventricular pacing capture (PC) in ≥ 1 tested vector. The mean pacing thresholds at PW 10 ms, 3 ms, 1 ms were 7.3 ± 4.2 mA (18 pts), 9.0 ± 4.7 mA (13 pts), 11.8 ± 4.5 mA (7 pts), respectively. Failed PC in 8 pts was mostly associated with sub-optimal implant or atrial PC. Among the 18 pts with PC, 10 pts had the best PC in bipolar vs 7 pts in unipolar (no difference in 1 pt). Among the 16 pts with bipolar PC, widely spaced bipolar electrode pairs were consistently associated with the lowest threshold in all pts. For the 16 pts with bipolar PC with electrode spacing 19 mm and 10 ms PW, the median pacing threshold was 3.0 V (IQR: 2.3-8.1 V) or 4.2 mA (IQR: 3.0-10.5 mA). Conclusion: Preliminary data demonstrates that pacing is feasible from this novel extravascular substernal location. A bipolar substernal electrode configuration with wide electrode spacing has the potential to provide pacing in a future extravascular defibrillator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesFrench-language works237,207