MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Molecular subtypes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

2017· article· en· W2600669512 on OpenAlexaff
Roland Seiler, Brian Winters, James J. Douglas, Bas W.G. van Rhijn, Gottfrid Sjödahl, Seth P. Lerner, Katherine A. Hoadley, Scott North, David J. McConkey, Woonyoung Choi, William Y. Kim, Kim E.M. van Kessel, George N. Thalmann, Elai Davicioni, Simon J. Crabb, Joost L. Boormans, Marc Dall’Era, Jonathan L. Wright, Michiel Simon Van Der Heijden, Peter C. Black

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsGenome British ColumbiaUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubtypingBladder cancerMedicineCystectomyConcordanceCisplatinOncologyTranscriptomeInternal medicineChemotherapyBasal (medicine)Neoadjuvant therapyRegimenPathologyCancerGene expressionGeneBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

281 Background: Molecular subtypes of muscle-invasive bladder cancers (MIBC) have recently been discovered based on gene expression. We investigated the impact of different subtyping methods on response to neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) and developed a single sample model for subtyping. Methods: Transcriptome-wide microarray analysis was conducted on pre-NAC transurethral resection (TUR) specimens of 223 patients with MIBC who received NAC followed by cystectomy at 5 centers. The specimens were classified according to four published methods for molecular subtype (UNC, MDA, TCGA, Lund). Overall survival (OS) for each subtype was compared between NAC patients in this study and non-NAC patients from the provisional TCGA. A genomic classifier (GSC) was trained to predict subtype in a single sample model and validated in independent NAC (2 centers) and non-NAC datasets. Results: The models generated subtype calls similar to previously published ratios. Concordance of a given subtype between the different methods was high. Luminal tumors had the best OS independent of NAC. Patients with tumors classified as UNC basal, MDA basal and TCGA cluster III experienced the greatest improvement in OS after NAC compared to surgery alone. Tumors assigned as UNC claudin-low had the worst OS irrespective of treatment regimen (p=0.005). GSC accurately predicted four classes (luminal, luminal-infiltrated, basal, claudin-low) and the differential impact of a basal subtype on patient OS in NAC (3-yr survival of 75.2%; p=0.001) and non-NAC (3-yr survival of 42.4%; p=0.014) cohorts could be validated. Conclusions: The benefit of NAC varies between molecular subtypes. The good prognosis of luminal/cluster I tumors could not be improved with NAC, which suggests these patients may be managed best with surgery alone. The prognosis of patients with basal tumors improved the most when treated with NAC compared to surgery alone. Poor OS of claudin-low tumors even after NAC implies that these tumors are resistant to cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and these patients should be included in protocols investigating alternative treatment options like immunotherapy. Further validation prior to clinical implementation is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.389 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→