Review of: Remington, R. & Zickefoose, S. (2009). How Forbidden Love Drove a 12-Year-Old to Murder Her Family: Runaway Devil. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the afternoon of April 23, 2006, the family's next-door neighbours, Sarah and her son Gareth, discovered the blood-spattered bodies in the suburban middle-class neighbourhood of Ross Glen in Medicine Hat.Debra lay on the floor in an unnatural position smeared in blood and was naked from the waist down (p.7-8).Marc, who was found lying face up on the floor in the basement, had an abundance of blood on his right eye and was covered on his entire body with several vast lacerations and stab wounds (p.8).Jacob lay lifeless in bed in nothing but his underwear with a large gash in his throat (p.9).Two journalists Robert Remington, and Sherri Zickefoose reveal the terrifying details about what happened to this family: the forbidden love between a young 12-year-old and her much older boyfriend Jeremy, who rebelled against her family, and details regarding the community of terrified families that could not understand this terrible crime.Robert and Sherri's investigation lead them to believe that J.R.'s desire and passion to be with Jeremy sparked a motive to kill: because her parents eliminated the barrier that kept them from being together.The motive was reinforced during J.R.'s interrogation as she told them she was tired with the life she had at home and that her parents did not allow her to have any relationships: which was especially challenging for a young teenager.Sherri Zickefoose was the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".