MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2600779999 · doi:10.2118/184565-ms

Squeezing the Bakken: Successful Scale Squeeze Programs Lead to Shift in Bakken Scale Control

2017· article· en· W2600779999 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kevin Spicka, Lisa Holding Eagle, Ian Littlehales, J. Fidoe, M. M. Jordan, Z. Zosel, Saralee Glasser

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE International Conference on Oilfield Chemistry · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScale (ratio)Petroleum engineeringScale modelOil shaleSCALE-UPBoomGeologyComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceEngineeringAerospace engineeringOceanographyGeographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper highlights efforts taken in answering the following question: "Can horizontal unconventional shale wells be successfully squeezed for scale control?". The Bakken shale formations in North Dakota, Montana and Alberta have presented unique operational challenges during the unconventional play boom. Despite the ability to control scale formation with conventional scale inhibitors under Bakken conditions, scale formation (primarily calcium carbonate) can still remain an operational challenge due to well design and sub-optimal scale inhibitor deployment. Due to limited experience in the industry in scale squeezing fractured long reach horizontal wells, scale squeezes have not been frequently applied in the Bakken. As a result of sub-optimal scale control despite application of suitable scale inhibitors, an in-depth evaluation of scale squeeze chemistries, application methods and scale squeeze modeling has been ongoing in the Bakken. These successful applications are being studied to improve current scale squeeze modeling approaches for horizontal, fracked wells in addition to understanding the factors that impact Bakken scale squeezes. The lessons learned in modeling, application and monitoring of the scale squeezes will be discussed in this paper. Squeeze9 and Place-iT™ field history matching indicate the primary impact to squeeze life is the amount of scale inhibitor (both concentration and volume) used while overflush volumes have less of an impact. This varies from traditional scale squeezes that combine scale inhibitor and overflush volumes to achieve the desired scale squeeze lifetime. Due to the unique brine chemistry of the Bakken, squeeze monitoring has relied less upon traditional ion tracking and almost exclusively upon more advanced environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) of suspended solids within the produced brine samples. Examples of successful Bakken squeezes lasting more than 1 year will be highlighted. The successful applications of scale squeezes in the Bakken are bringing a new method of efficient, cost effective, long term scale control to unconventional plays. The lessons learned in the Bakken, and the resulting advancement of unconventional scale squeeze models and theories, have implications for the global industry as unconventional plays across the world are identified, explored and produced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE International Conference on Oilfield ChemistrySame topicCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207