Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte est base sur un discours prononce au Symposium sur la science et la spiritualite en 2013 Allemagne. Il expose le probleme encore inconnu de la geo-ingenierie militaire comme l’ont revele les recherches de Rosalie Bertell et essaie de discrediter la these officielle que le co 2 n’est pas respons- able du chaos grandissant dans le monde. Au contraire, il cache les consequences de 70 annees de developpement suite a l’intrusion de cette nouvelle guerre. Pour une meilleure comprehension de ce probleme, cet article prone une analyse theorique ecofeministe et critique patriarcale de ce que nous connaissons a date. This article is based on a speech given at a large Symposium on Science and Spirituality in Germany in 2013. It addresses and tries to inform the public of the still unknown issue of military “geoengineering,” as described in Dr. Rosalie Bertell s research, and tries to make clear that the officially propagated thesis of co 2 as the reason behind the growing climate chaos in the world is not true. It is instead hiding the consequences of 7o years of development of a new military geo-warfare, applied internationally. For a better understanding of the issue the article tries to include an ecofeminist and patriarchy critical theoretical analysis of the facts we know so far.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it