MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2600820541 · doi:10.1002/chem.201701254

Unsymmetrical Iron P‐NH‐P′ Catalysts for the Asymmetric Pressure Hydrogenation of Aryl Ketones

2017· article· en· W2600820541 on OpenAlexafffund
Samantha A. M. Smith, Paraskevi O. Lagaditis, Anne Lüpke, Alan J. Lough, Robert H. Morris

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKillam TrustsOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceDeutscher Akademischer AustauschdienstCanada Council for the ArtsCompute Canada
KeywordsArylCatalysisChemistryMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The reductive amination of α‐dialkylphosphine acetaldehydes with enantiopure β‐aminophosphines is a new, versatile route to unsymmetrical tridentate (pincer) ligands P‐NH‐P′. Four new ligands PR 2 CH 2 CH 2 NHCHR′CHR′′PPh 2 (R= i Pr, Cy, R′=Ph, CH(CH 3 ) 2 , R′′=Ph, H) prepared in this way are used to make the iron(II) complexes mer ‐FeCl 2 (CO)(P‐NH‐P′) and mer ‐FeCl(H)(CO)(P‐NH‐P′). The hydride complex with the rigid ligand with R′=R′′=Ph is an efficient and highly enantioselective homogeneous asymmetric pressure hydrogenation (APH) catalyst. Prochiral aryl ketones are reduced under mild conditions (THF, 0.1 mol % catalyst, 1 mol % KO t Bu, 5–10 bar, 50 °C) to the ( S )‐alcohols, usually in enantiomeric excess ( ee ) greater than 90 %. DFT calculations provided transition‐state structures for the enantiodetermining hydride‐transfer step.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.504
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations88
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207