MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Do patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who have chemotherapy initiated during a hospital admission benefit from therapy?

2014· article· en· W2600973140 on OpenAlexaffabout
David E. Dawe, Gregory R. Pond, Peter Ellis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityJuravinski Cancer CentreUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChemotherapyLung cancerRetrospective cohort studyCohortStage (stratigraphy)Internal medicineHospital admissionCancerEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e17661 Background: Lung cancer patients (pts) admitted to hospital in Canada generally have a poor performance status (ECOG 3 or 4). This often precludes treatment for pts with NSCLC, although many oncologists will offer chemotherapy (CT) to hospitalized SCLC pts due to rapid and frequent responses. However, this practice is based on little published data. This study investigates the proportion of SCLC pts with CT initiated in hospital and their outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all Ontario pts diagnosed with SCLC (ICD-9 codes 162.2-162.9) between January 1, 2000-December 31, 2010. De-identified data including demographic, staging, treatment and outcome information were extracted by the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences. The outcomes of this sub-study were the proportion of patients initiating CT while hospitalized versus outpatient based CT initiation and their overall survival. Initiation of CT while admitted to hospital was defined as the first instance of billing for CT dated between a hospital admission and discharge. Results: Among 9021 pts diagnosed with SCLC, 6,568 (73.8%) received chemotherapy, of which 1631 (24.8%) initiated CT while admitted to hospital. The proportion of pts treated in hospital decreased over time. More pts initiating CT in hospital had late stage disease at diagnosis compared to those treated as outpatients, although staging information was not routinely recorded prior to 2007. Median overall survival (OS) for SCLC pts initiating CT in hospital was 6.9 months versus 11.7 months for those treated as outpatients and 1.4 months for patients receiving no CT. One year survival rates were 24.8%, 48.7%, and 10.4%, respectively. All differences have a p-value <0.001. Conclusions: This study shows that a substantial proportion of pts initiate CT while admitted to hospital. These pts likely have a poor performance status. While treatment of this group is associated with poorer median OS than patients initiating CT as an outpatient, CT appears to prolong life in comparison to no treatment. These data provide supportive evidence for the use of CT in poor functioning pts with SCLC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicLung Cancer Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207