MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Genomic architecture of radioresistant prostate cancer.

2017· article· en· W2600997186 on OpenAlexaffabout
Melvin L.K. Chua, Erle M. Holgersen, Veronica Y. Sabelnykova, Adriana Salcedo, Alice Meng, Michael Fraser, Theodorus van der Kwast, Paul C. Boutros, Robert G. Bristow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstate cancerRadioresistancePTENMedicineProstateCancerRadiation therapyGenome instabilityCopy-number variationCancer researchOncologyGeneInternal medicineBiologyGenomeGeneticsDNA damage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

26 Background: Spatial intra-tumoral heterogeneity of prostate cancer is secondary to genomic diversity and multi-clonality. These unique features potentially promote resistance to treatment. Here, we investigated if clonal selection or adaptation of new clones dominates in prostate cancer at the time of recurrence following radiotherapy. Methods: We identified 11 patients with biopsy-proven multifocal recurrent prostate cancer following radiotherapy. Copy number aberration (CNA) profiling was performed on 33 anatomically distinct tumor foci with 11 matched-normals. 4 cases had matched pre-radiotherapy tumors for CNA profiling to assess for clonality. We evaluated for recurrent gene amplifications and deletions, and determined genomic instability by percent genome aberration (PGA). We also compared these genomic indices against 373 sporadic prostate cancers from the Canadian Prostate Cancer Gene Network. Results: We observed large intra- and inter-patient variation (p <0.001, one-way ANOVA) in PGA scores among the radioresistant tumors. Interestingly, although total CNA counts did not differ between the radioresistant and sporadic cohorts (median = 40, radioresistant vs 33, sporadic, p = 0.20], there was a trend for increased genomic instability in the radioresistant cohort (median PGA = 8.8 vs 4.9, p = 0.059). Spatial resolution of gene-level CNAs revealed the acquisition of CNAs that were both common and non-recurrent in the multi-focal radioresistant tumors, thus suggesting a common clonal origin, with subsequent divergent evolution. Importantly, we observed a mixture of CNAs, including known prognostic genes in prostate cancer, namely NKX3-1, PTEN, TP53, CDKN1B, and CDH1,that was shared between pre-treatment and radioresistant tumors, favoring clonal selection. We also discovered a novel deleted region on Chr3p, consisting of RAD18 and FANCD2, which was uniquely present in the radioresistant tumors. Conclusions: Our novel observations in a small cohort of radioresistant prostate cancers favor the model of clonal selection, as opposed to new-onset tumors. These results support the discovery of biomarkers a priori, and targeted treatment of these radioresistant clones to improve the therapeutic ratio of precision radiotherapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.524
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→