MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Post hoc analysis of sustained efficacy/tolerability of ≥12 cycles of omacetaxine mepesuccinate in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

2013· article· en· W2601024426 on OpenAlexaff
Delphine Réa, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Meir Wetzler, Franck E. Nicolini, Jeffrey H. Lipton, Luke P. Akard, H. Jean Khoury, Mauricette Michallet, Agnès Guerci‐Bresler, Charles Chuah, Andrzej Hellmann, Laurence Legros, Krzysztof Warzocha, Purvish M. Parikh, Adam Craig, Jörge E. Cortes

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTolerabilityInternal medicineAdverse effectImatinibPost-hoc analysisClinical trialGastroenterologyRegimenMyeloid leukemiaOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

7066 Background: Subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate (OMA), a first-in-class cephalotaxine, inhibits protein synthesis independent of Bcr-Abl signaling. It showed clinical activity in 2 phase II, open-label CML trials, 1 in patients with a T315I Bcr-Abl mutation failing imatinib, and 1 in patients failing ≥2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Methods: This post hoc analysis pooled patients with chronic phase (CP) or accelerated phase (AP) from the 2 trials. 28-day cycles of OMA 1.25 mg/m2BID were given ≤14 days for induction, ≤7 days as maintenance with dose delay/change as needed. Primary endpoints were major cytogenetic response (MCyR) for CP and complete hematologic response (CHR) for AP. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Results: Of 108 CP and 51 AP patients from the 2 trials, 31 (29%) CP and 7 (14%) AP patients received ≥12 cycles (Table). At baseline in the ≥12-cycle groups, most CP (median age 59 y) and AP patients (median age 67 y) had received hydroxyurea (17/31, 4/7) and ≥2 TKIs (22/31, 5/7), were not in CHR (22/31, 5/7), and were T315I positive (23/31, 3/7). As of March 31, 2012, 9 CP and 2 AP patients continued OMA treatment. Overall, mean days dosed per cycle were 6.1 for CP, 9.7 for AP; 5.3 and 8.9 at cycle 12. Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 35/38 patients in this post hoc analysis, most in early cycles; 15/31 CP, 2/7 AP had grade ≥3 AEs first occurring at ≥12 cycles. Across all cycles, most common grade ≥3 AEs were thrombocytopenia (24/31 CP, 5/7 AP), anemia (16/31, 7/7), and neutropenia (17/31, 3/7).Nine patients receiving ≥12 cycles (5/31, 4/7) discontinued, most commonly due to disease progression (n=2). Conclusions: In this post hoc analysis of heavily pretreated CML-CP and CML-AP patients who had failed prior TKI therapy, efficacy was often durable for those who received OMA for ≥12 cycles. Most grade 3/4 AEs were hematologic and declined with time. Support: Teva BPP R and D, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT00375219, NCT00462943.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207