Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Valproic Acid Has Differential Effects on Trafficking of Normal Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells and Leukemic Blasts.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Stromal-cell derived factor (SDF)-1α (CXCL12) is a potent chemoattractant for hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPC) whose chemotactic effect is mediated through the G protein-coupled receptor CXCR4. The expression level of CXCR4 on leukemic blasts is known to be a major prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) because it increases cell retention, survival and growth within the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment, resulting in resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Modulation of CXCR4 expression would be relevant not only in the trafficking of normal HSPC and leukemic cells but also in the response of the latter to chemotherapeutic agents. Previously, we demonstrated that valproic acid (VPA), an effective histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDI) known to induce differentiation in leukemic blasts, increases proliferation, self-renewal and engraftment of normal murine HSPC (Cancer Res.2005:65;2537), and increases the response of AML cells to chemotherapeutic agents (Blood2003:102). Because of this differential effect we hypothesized that VPA enhances homing/engraftment of normal human HSPC by increasing the cell surface expression of CXCR4 but induces the release of AML blasts from BM by decreasing it, making the AML blasts more susceptible to chemotherapy. Thus, we examined the effect of VPA on CXCR4 expression (by FACS analysis and real-time RT-PCR) and on functional response towards an SDF-1α gradient (by chemotaxis assay) of normal HSPC (CD34+ cells from cord blood (CB)) and AML cells (KG-1 and HL-60 cell lines and primary AML cells). Cells were incubated for 24 h and 48 h in IMDM supplemented with 20% FCS in the presence of 1 mM VPA. We found that VPA increases by about 2-fold the percentage of CXCR4-expressing CB CD34+ and KG-1 cells after 24 h incubation, but did not increase the percentage of CXCR4-expressing HL-60 or primary AML cells. Surprisingly, after 48 h incubation we found that VPA decreases (up to 3-fold) the percentage of CXCR4-expressing HL-60 and primary AML cells. These effects were also confirmed at the mRNA level in KG-1 cells (8-fold upregulation) and in HL-60 cells (2.5-fold downregulation). Consistent with these findings, VPA was also found to increase (1.8-fold for normal CD34+ cells and 1.6-fold for KG-1 cells) chemotaxis towards SDF-1α (20 ng/mL), which was inhibited in KG-1 cells by AMD3100, a potent antagonist of CXCR4. On the other hand, chemotaxis was decreased in VPA-treated HL-60 cells (4-fold) and AML primary cells (2.5-fold). Our present data support previous findings that there is a relationship between the differentiation status of cells and their response to HDI such as VPA. We propose that very immature cells (CD34+ cells) respond to VPA by upregulation of CXCR4 (thereby enhancing homing responses towards an SDF-1α gradient); whereas more differentiated cells (AML blasts) downregulate CXCR4 resulting in their egress from the BM. Hence, we suggest that ex vivo priming of HSPC with HDI may improve their marrow engraftment. On the other hand, HDI may mobilize AML cells from the protective stromal microenvironment and render them more susceptible to chemotherapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".