On the distribution of values in the quadratic assignment problem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We obtain a number of results regarding the distribution of values of a quadratic function f on the set of n × n permutation matrices (identified with the symmetric group Sn) around its optimum (minimum or maximum). We estimate the fraction of permutations σ such that f(σ) lies within a given neighborhood of the optimal value of f and relate the optimal value with the average value of f over a neighborhood of the optimal permutation. We describe a natural class of functions (which includes, for example, the objective function in the Traveling Salesman Problem) with a relative abundance of near-optimal permutations. Also, we identify a large class of functions f with the property that permutations close to the optimal permutation in the Hamming metric of Sn tend to produce near optimal values of f (such is, for example, the objective function in the symmetric Traveling Salesman Problem). We show that for general f, just the opposite behavior may take place: an average permutation in the vicinity of the optimal permutation may be much worse than an average permutation in the whole group Sn.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.036 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".