Prognostic classification of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) following radical cystectomy (RC) alone or with perioperative chemotherapy: Analysis of the U.S. National Cancer Database (NCDB).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
372 Background: While the role of adjuvant therapy for MIBC is being evaluated in randomized trials of patients (pts) following RC with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC), pts receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) have been excluded. Understanding the prognosis of a broad spectrum of pts undergoing RC with or without perioperative chemotherapy may aid patient selection, stratification and interpretation of nonrandomized data. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the NCDB to construct a comprehensive prognostic nomogram in this broad population. Methods: Data from NCDB was obtained for all patients diagnosed with clinical (c)-T2-T4aN0M0 urothelial carcinoma of bladder who underwent RC in the US from 2004-2013. Those who underwent RC > 6 months (mo) after initiating NC, received AC > 4 mo after RC were excluded to allow only those receiving optimal therapy. Pts with unknown race and number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined were also excluded. Multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the impact on survival of: clinical stage, pathologic (p)-stage, treatment group (RC alone, NC, AC), age, year of diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), race, number of examined LNs examined and sex. Results: A total of 10,256 pts were evaluable for analysis: 6864 in the RC group, 1380 in the AC group and 2012 in the NC group. On multivariate analysis, the following variables were significantly (p < 0.001) associated with survival: treatment group, age ( < 65 vs. ≥ 65 years), CCI, p-stage and number of examined LNs. Calibration was performed and the c-index was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76-0.81). Limitations of a retrospective analysis apply. Conclusions: A comprehensive prognostic nomogram to predict the survival of pts with MIBC undergoing RC with or without NC or AC was proposed. The estimation of residual risk of mortality after RC alone or with AC or NC aids optimal stratification of pts in more inclusive randomized trials of subsequent adjuvant therapy. The nomogram also highlights the impact of comorbidities and age, and helps interpret non-randomized data evaluating perioperative regimens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".