MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Interim safety results of a global early access protocol (EAP) of abiraterone acetate (AA) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing after taxane-based chemotherapy.

2013· article· en· W2601261230 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel J. George, Tracy McGowan, Gedske Daugaard, Thomas W. Flaig, Lajos Géczi, Sebastién J. Hotte, Paul N. Mainwaring, Fred Saad, Matthew R. Smith, Ciro Eduardo Souza, Cora N. Sternberg, Miah Hiang Tay, José Manuel Garrido, Anil Londhe, Vahid Naini, Mary B. Todd, Arturo Molina

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineProstate cancerAbiraterone acetateTaxaneDocetaxelDiscontinuationAdverse effectSurgeryCancerBreast cancerAndrogen deprivation therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5059 Background: The COU-AA-301 phase 3 trial showed significantly longer overall survival for AA + prednisone (P) than P alone in mCRPC pts refractory to docetaxel. This global EAP was conducted in the same setting to collect additional safety data. Methods: Open-label EAP in pts with mCRPC who progressed after 1 - 2 chemotherapy regimens (≥ 1 taxane), resided in areas where AA was unavailable and were ineligible for ongoing clinical trials of AA. Pts received AA (1000 mg PO/d) plus P (5 mg bid) in 28 d cycles until disease progression. Only serious or clinically important adverse events (AEs) were to be reported by investigators. First interim results (clinical cut-off date: December 31, 2011), reported as part of regulatory submissions, are presented. Results: 1079 pts from 15 countries were included: N. America (47%), Europe (29%), Australia (13%), Latin America (7%), and Asia (3%). Median age: 70 years (range: 47 – 93); 89% of pts were White. Median treatment exposure, incl. pts still on treatment (285 pts), was ≈ 3 months. 620 pts (58%) received ≥ 4 treatment cycles, 58 pts (5%) received ≥ 8 cycles. 441 pts (41%) reported serious or clinically important AEs, which were treatment-related in 154 pts (14%). Most common grade 3-4 AEs: ↑ALP (6%), anemia (3%), hypertension (3%), back pain (2%), and fatigue (2%). Grade 3-4 AEs of special interest were infrequent: LFT abnormalities (8%), hypertension (3%), cardiac disorders (2%), hypokalemia (< 1%), fluid retention/edema (< 1%), osteoporotic fractures (< 1%). Main reason for discontinuation (795 pts): disease progression, in 335 pts (31%). 253 pts (23%) discontinued after marketing authorization. Discontinuations due to treatment-emergent AEs, death, or withdrawal of consent were < 6% each. Conclusions: The safety profile observed in these EAP interim results was consistent with that in the COU-AA-301 randomized, placebo controlled trial conducted in the same clinical setting. No new safety signals with AA plus P were detected in this expanded patient population, which included pts from Latin America and Asia, i.e. regions that did not participate in COU-AA-301. Clinical trial information: NCT01217697.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.035
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0350.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.495
Teacher spread0.394 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→