Study of Cervical Pap Smears in 558 Cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer is one of the major causes of mortality among women worldwide. The present research aimed to study and analyze 558 pap smears from women presenting with various gynecological indications and as a routine screening test. Methods: This study was carried out in the Department of Pathology of Jahurul Islam Medical College from the pap smears coming from the Gynecology OPD from February 9, 2015 to February 11, 2016. Pap smears were taken from patients aged 20 - 69 years presenting with different gynecological complaints and as a routine screening test using Ayres spatula. Smears were reported as per the 2004 Bethesda System. Results: Of the 558 pap smears studied, 532 smears were satisfactory for evaluation. Among them, 492 (92.5%) were inflammatory smear, 16 (3%) smears showed low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), four (0.8%) smears showed high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), and four (0.7%) smears showed atypical cells suggestive of squamous cell carcinoma. Chronic per vaginal whitish discharge with itching was the most common complain (70.2% patients). Conclusion: Pap smear is an easy and economical screening method to detect premalignant and malignant lesions of cervix which helps in proper treatment. Clin Infect Immun. 2017;2(1):5-7 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cii18w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".