MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2601520321 · doi:10.3138/jcfs.33.3.345

Family Backgrounds of Teenage Female Sex Workers in Istanbul Metropolitan Area

2002· article· en· W2601520321 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Esin Kuntay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Comparative Family Studies · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeglectSexual abuseCriminologyQualitative researchMetropolitan areaSociologyPsychologyGender studiesGeographyPoison controlSuicide preventionMedicineSocial sciencePsychiatryEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The International Labour Organisation aiming to eliminate child labour is directing special attention to one of the most intolerable and abusive form; juvenile prostitution. The strategies addressing to this serious social problem call for the protection, rehabilitation and resocialisation of these young women who are confronted with great traumatising behaviour and hurt themselves. In the current climate of the power structure an individual, especially an underage person, may easily cede control of her/his life circumstances to the dominating influence of the market in a modernising world. A person during childhood is vulnerable and for her, the danger of being exploited is greater. Taking all this into consideration, it is not wrong to describe juvenile prostitution as ‘forced labour’. This paper will explore the family backgrounds of teenage female sex workers in the Istanbul metropolitan area. The stories told by female sex workers reveal many unfavourable conditions in their homes. Parental use of intoxicating substances, neglect, emotional, physical and sexual abuse, violent parenting are commonly observed in the lives of these girls. The turbulent home lives display why these girls abscond and are trapped by the illegal world of underground prostitution. The material presented here is based upon data accumulated in a study undertaken in Istanbul in 1998. 1 Grounded theory approach to qualitative research was adopted in the study. Data was gathered through in-dept interviews with 30 participants between the ages of 14-18. The locations, where the interviews were conducted are some of the main police bureaus of the Istanbul police headquarters and the Venereal Disease Hospital. We interpret our findings of the family backgrounds of the participants in terms of the values and norms salient in the Turkish culture, relating to the child rearing practices. The patriarchal family structure, gender issues such as the concepts of virginity, honour also come into play in our analyses. This is a study on a very sensitive topic. Thus this paper also addresses to some important methodological concerns and points out to some preventive measures and intervention methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Comparative Family StudiesSame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207