Das Schulwerk: una base para el desarrollo cognitivo, musical y artístico de los niños
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La aproximacion, propuesta o enfoque de la educacion musical desarrollado por Carl Orff disfruta de amplia difusion y se reconoce su valor como metodo de educacion musical por parte de muchos especialistas en America del Norte. Sin embargo, existe poca investigacion, especialmente en ingles, sobre las bases teoricas del enfoque Orff. El trabajo de Orff esta incluido en los cinco volumenes de DasSchulwerk –una coleccion de materiales secuenciados para voz, instrumentos Orff y flautas. Orff afirmo que los materiales reflejan la evolucion historica de la musica, pero no hay una discusion explicita del desarrollo musical infantil ?que teoria ha determinado la secuenciacion de estos materiales? ?Das Schulwerk es una mera coleccion de modelos historicos o existe una teoria evolutiva implicita en las actividades y secuencias de materiales utilizadas en el enfoque Orff? El proposito de este trabajo es: 1) determinar hasta que punto existe una teoria implicita o explicita en la aproximacion Orff; y 2) explorar las relaciones entre el concepto orffiano de desarrollo musical y las actuales teorias sobre el desarrollo de la cognicion musical.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".