MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2601579480 · doi:10.7203/leeme.20.9767

Das Schulwerk: una base para el desarrollo cognitivo, musical y artístico de los niños

2017· article· es· W2601579480 on OpenAlexaff
Lori-Anne Dolloff

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Electrónica de LEEME · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Music Education Insights
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyMusicalArtVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La aproximacion, propuesta o enfoque de la educacion musical desarrollado por Carl Orff disfruta de amplia difusion y se reconoce su valor como metodo de educacion musical por parte de muchos especialistas en America del Norte. Sin embargo, existe poca investigacion, especialmente en ingles, sobre las bases teoricas del enfoque Orff. El trabajo de Orff esta incluido en los cinco volumenes de DasSchulwerk –una coleccion de materiales secuenciados para voz, instrumentos Orff y flautas. Orff afirmo que los materiales reflejan la evolucion historica de la musica, pero no hay una discusion explicita del desarrollo musical infantil ?que teoria ha determinado la secuenciacion de estos materiales? ?Das Schulwerk es una mera coleccion de modelos historicos o existe una teoria evolutiva implicita en las actividades y secuencias de materiales utilizadas en el enfoque Orff? El proposito de este trabajo es: 1) determinar hasta que punto existe una teoria implicita o explicita en la aproximacion Orff; y 2) explorar las relaciones entre el concepto orffiano de desarrollo musical y las actuales teorias sobre el desarrollo de la cognicion musical.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Electrónica de LEEMESame topicDiverse Music Education InsightsFrench-language works237,207