MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2601592890

Exploring factors affecting smallmouth bass nest success and reproductive behavior

2004· article· en· W2601592890 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Geoffrey B. Steinhart

Bibliographic record

VenueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceOhio State University
KeywordsNest (protein structural motif)Bass (fish)FisheryReproductive behaviorReproductive successEcologyBiologyPopulationDemographyResearch methodology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herein, I describe research that explores factors affecting smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) reproductive behavior and success.Smallmouth bass are a model species to explore reproductive behavior because they invest large amounts of energy in parental care, spawn multiple times, and exhibit indeterminate growth.Smallmouth bass must balance current and future fitness when deciding how much care to provide.Ultimately, reproductive success and behavior may influence recruitment.By conducting a series of observational studies and manipulative experiments, I examined how smallmouth bass reproductive success and behavior differed by environment (Lake Erie, Ohio, USA, and Lake Opeongo, Ontario, Canada).In Lake Erie, exotic nest predators (round goby, Neogobius melanostomus) consumed more than 800 smallmouth bass embryos from nests every time an angler caught and released the nest-guarding male (Chapter 2).In addition, high round goby densities necessitated vigorous nest defense by parents in Lake Erie, thus causing parents to expend twice the energy on care than Lake Opeongo, where round gobies were absent (Chapter 3).Smallmouth bass nest success in Lake Erie was negatively influenced by angling and storms, but not by round goby consumption of offspring (Chapter 4).Simulations of nest-guarding smallmouth bass, making decisions that maximized their expected lifetime fitness, defended smaller broods in Lake Erie than in Lake Opeongo (Chapter 5).Mean adult survival rate, a function of age and care cost, was most important in determining optimal behavior (Chapter 5).By decreasing offspring survival and increasing cost of care, round goby caused optimal parents to abandon larger broods than when round gobies were absent (Chapter 5).Parental behavior, in turn, affected abandonment of offspring by simulated smallmouth bass populations; however, offspring production was not influenced by behavior (Chapter 6).Simulations of spawning smallmouth bass in lakes Erie and Opeongo demonstrated that the success of management strategies depended on parental behavior and the environmental conditions underlying optimal decisions (Chapter 6).While round gobies, as predators, may reduce smallmouth bass offspring production, round gobies, as prey, provided a new food source for young-ofthe-year smallmouth bass, which are growing faster since the round goby arrived (Chapter 7).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.014
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)Same topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207