First-order statistical speckle models improve robustness and reproducibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound perfusion estimates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) permits the quantification and monitoring of adaptive tumor responses in the face of anti-angiogenic treatment, with the goal of informing targeted therapy. However, conventional CEUS image analysis relies on mean signal intensity as an estimate of tracer concentration in indicator-dilution modeling. This discounts additional information that may be available from the first-order speckle statistics in a CEUS image. Heterogeneous vascular networks, typical of tumor-induced angiogenesis, lead to heterogeneous contrast enhancement of the imaged tumor cross-section.\nTo address this, a linear (B-mode) processing approach was developed to quantify the change in the first-order speckle statistics of B-mode cine loops due to the incursion of microbubbles. The technique, named the EDoF (effective degrees of freedom) method, was developed on tumor bearing mice (MDA-MB-231LN mammary fat pad inoculation) and evaluated using nonlinear (two-pulse amplitude modulated) contrast microbubble-specific images. To improve the potential clinical applicability of the technique, a second-generation compound probability density function for the statistics of two-pulse amplitude modulated contrast-enhanced ultrasound images was developed. The compound technique was tested in an antiangiogenic drug trial (bevacizumab) on tumor bearing mice (MDA-MB-231LN), and evaluated with gold-standard histology and contrast-enhanced X-ray computed tomography. The compound statistical model could more accurately discriminate anti-VEGF treated tumors from untreated tumors than conventional CEUS image. The technique was then applied to a rapid patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of chicken embryos. The ultimate goal of the PDX model is to screen RCC patients for de novo sunitinib resistance.\nThe analysis of the first-order speckle statistics of contrast-enhanced ultrasound cine loops provides more robust and reproducible estimates of tumor blood perfusion than conventional image analysis. Theoretically this form of analysis could quantify perfusion heterogeneity and provide estimates of vascular fractal dimension, but further work is required to determine what physiological features influence these measures. Treatment sensitivity matrices, which combine vascular measures from CEUS and power Doppler, may be suitable for screening of de novo sunitinib resistance in patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma. Further studies are required to assess whether this protocol can be predictive of patient outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".