Efficacy of mycobacterium phlei cell wall-nucleic acid complex (MCNA) in BCG-unresponsive patients.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
342 Background: Previously, we reported the results of a single-armed, multi-institutional study on the efficacy of MCNA in patients who failed intravesical BCG treatment. Since that publication, a new standardized definition for BCG-unresponsiveness has been established. We re-analyzed the oncologic outcomes following intravesical MCNA in patients classified as BCG-unresponsive according to the new definition. Methods: Patients with recurring high grade NMIBC after intravesical BCG were enrolled. For this analysis, we focused on the patients satisfying the minimum criterion for adequate BCG treatment (5/6 induction and 2/3 maintenance). Treatment course included 6 weekly intravesical instillations of 8mg MCNA followed by 3 weekly instillations at months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24. Followup assessments included cystoscopy, urine cytology and biopsy. Patients absent of high grade disease confirmed by central review of biopsy were deemed disease-free. Results: Of the 129 patients enrolled, 94 (68 CIS with/without papillary tumors, 26 papillary only tumors) fit the criteria for the new BCG-unresponsive definition. In the group with papillary tumors, DFS measured at months 6, 12, and 24 were 61.2%(38.2-77.8%), 61.2(38.2-77.8%), and 50.1%(27.5-69%). In the CIS-containing group, the corresponding DFS were 44.8%(32.3-56.4%), 26.5%(16.3-37.9%), and 16.6%(8.6-26.9%), respectively. Conclusions: Intravesical MCNA therapy has the potential to offer 26.5% of patients with CIS and 61.2% of patients with papillary tumors a chance to safely preserve their bladder for at least 1 year. The efficacy in BCG-unresponsive patients was higher than that reported with all-comers, suggesting that adequate priming with BCG might be required for further immune-based response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".