MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mesothelin as a marker of response in malignant pleural mesothelioma

2009· article· en· W2601772729 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Wheatley‐Price, Baoming Yang, D. Patel, Clement Ma, Wei Xu, Natasha B. Leighl, R. Feld, Bong Ju Cho, Marc de Perrot, Geoffrey Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOccupational and environmental lung diseases
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDebulkingMalignancyMesotheliomaRadiological weaponRadiologyInternal medicineSurgeryCancerPathologyOvarian cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

7581 Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare malignancy related to asbestos exposure. Radiological assessment of disease status and treatment response using RECIST criteria is often difficult, therefore blood markers of disease burden may be useful adjunctively. Soluble mesothelin related peptide (sMRP) can distinguish between MPM and benign pleural disease. We performed an exploratory analysis to determine whether sMRP correlates with MPM disease course. Methods: From December 2006 to August 2008 blood samples were collected from MPM patients during clinic visits. Plasma sMRP levels were measured using the MESOMARK assay (Fujirebio diagnostics). Changes in sMRP levels were compared with corresponding radiological tests, scored as progression, stable or disease shrinkage. Results: From 41 patients, 165 samples were collected (median 4/patient; range 2–10). At study entry 34/37 (92%) patients with measurable disease had elevated sMRP (>9ng/ml, range 14–60). In 22 patients receiving chemotherapy or biologic therapy, relative (Fisher's exact test, p=3.2x10–6) and absolute (p=2.6x10–5) changes in sMRP correlated with radiological assessment (Table). All 4 post-surgery surveillance patients, with no evidence of recurrence, had normal sMRP levels (1.8–4.9). Of 8 patients who underwent surgical resection, 7 had elevated pre-operative sMRP that fell to normal post-operatively (Wilcoxon rank (WR) p=0.02). Absolute sMRP rose in all patients with radiological progression (systemic therapy, n=9, WR p=0.004; supportive care, n=10, WR p=0.02). Conclusions: sMRP levels not only correlate with surgical debulking but we report, for the first time, that they also correlate with treatment response and radiological progression in MPM patients undergoing systemic therapy or supportive care. sMRP may be a clinically useful biomarker in MPM clinical trials and in patient management. These findings should be validated prospectively. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.386 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicOccupational and environmental lung diseasesFrench-language works237,207