Submaximal Exercise Capacity in Juvenile Dermatomyositis after Longterm Disease: The Contribution of Muscle, Lung, and Heart Involvement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare submaximal exercise capacity in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) with controls, and analyze contributions of muscle, heart, and lung impairment in patients. METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with JDM, with a mean 16.9 years after symptom onset, and 59 sex- and age-matched controls completed a 6-min walk test (6MWT) and a timed up and go (TUG) test. Muscle function, disease activity/damage, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were assessed by validated tools; heart function by echocardiography and electrocardiography; and lung function by spirometry, DLCO, and body plethysmography. A thoracic high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging of the thighs were completed in patients. RESULTS: The 6MWT distance (6MWD) was 592 ± 81 m in patients versus 649 ± 79 m in controls (p < 0.001), and 563 ± 75 m in active versus 622 ± 76 m in inactive JDM (p = 0.004). The TUG time was 13.1 ± 2.1 s in patients versus 12.3 ± 2.0 s in controls (p = 0.034), and 13.7 ± 2.2 s in active versus 12.5 ± 1.8 s in inactive JDM (p = 0.028). No statistically significant difference was found between inactive JDM and controls in either test. In patients, the Childhood Myositis Assessment Score influenced the 6MWD and TUG time the most, followed by a low DLCO and HRCT pathology in the 6MWT and forced vital capacity in the TUG test. Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 physical component summary correlated strongly with both tests. CONCLUSION: Submaximal exercise capacity was reduced in patients with JDM, particularly those with active disease. This reduction was associated with muscle and lung dysfunction and poorer HRQOL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".