MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Risk of hospital-related morbidity among survivors of breast cancer in British Columbia, Canada.

2013· article· en· W2602102785 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christine Simmons, Elaine S. Wai, Scott Tyldesley, Maria Lorenzi, Dongdong Li, Mary L. McBride

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerPoisson regressionCohortSurvivorship curveRelative riskCancer registryPopulationCancerCohort studyInternal medicinePediatricsConfidence intervalEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1551 Background: Long-term consequences of cancer diagnosis and treatment are of increasing concern, as therapeutic interventions improve survival. Various survivorship programs exist; few address the importance of bridging oncology and primary care. This study assesses risk of late hospital-related morbidity among a population-based cohort of 39,436 3-year survivors of female breast cancer in British Columbia, Canada and compares the risk of morbidity to a similarly-aged comparison group. Methods: Demographic and clinical records of breast cancer survivors diagnosed between 1986 and 2005 were linked to inpatient records from provincial administrative databases. A comparison group from the provincial health insurance plan registry, frequency-matched by birth cohort was identified. Morbidity was ascertained from diagnosis codes listed on hospital records, and categorized by organ system. Poisson regression was used to assess the relative risk of morbidity, adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Results: Compared to controls, non-relapsed survivors diagnosed age 18-39 (N=1158) had more than twice the risk of morbidity (RR 2.57, 95%CI 2.21-2.98); those with a relapse (N=580) had eight times the risk (95% CI 6.78-9.44). Among those diagnosed age ≥40, non-relapsed survivors (N=20473) had a 62% increase in risk RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.57-1.68; relapsed survivors (N=5223) had triple the risk of morbidity (RR 2.89, 95% CI 2.78-3.01). In both cohorts, excess risks were statistically significant for most types of non-neoplastic morbidity, with highest rates seen for disorders of the blood, endocrine, skin and circulatory systems. Among survivors, those diagnosed with a higher stage cancer had increased risk of morbidity. Type of treatment received did not correlate with increased risk of morbidity (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00–1.11 for combination of surgery, radiation and systemic therapy vs surgery alone); majority of the risk increase is likely related to the impacts of cancer itself rather than treatment. Conclusions: Survivors of breast cancer are at an increased risk of a wide range of morbidities years after diagnosis. This underscores calls for improved models of survivorship care and continued survivorship research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer survivorship and care→French-language works237,207→