Is severe hypercalcemia immediately life-threatening?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Severe hypercalcemia is often considered an emergency because of a potential risk of cardiac arrest or coma. However, there is little evidence to support this. The aim of our study was to assess whether severe hypercalcemia (Ca>4 mmol/l or 16 mg/dl) was associated with immediately life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias or neurological complications in patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED). METHODS: A retrospective observational study was carried out over a 5-year period (2008-2012). Eligible patients were admitted to the Adult Emergency Department of Nantes University Hospital and had a calcium concentration in excess of 4 mmol/l. There were no exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the number of life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias and/or neurological complications during the stay in the ED. The secondary outcomes were correlation between calcium concentrations/ECG QTc intervals and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 126 204 adult patients had calcium concentrations measured. Thirty one (0.025%) patients had severe hypercalcemia as defined in our study. The median calcium concentration was 4.3 mmol/l (Q1, 4.2; Q3, 4.7) and the median albumin-adjusted calcium concentration was 4.3 mmol/l (Q1, 4.1; Q3, 4.7). No patient presented with a life-threatening cardiac event during stay in the ED. The median ED stay was 7 h 32 min. One patient presented with a coma of multifactorial origin. There was no correlation between calcemia and QTc intervals (P=0.60). Mortality at 1 year was 55% (17 patients). CONCLUSION: We found no cases of immediately life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias or neurological complications associated with hypercalcemia above 4 mmol/l over a 5-year period in a large tertiary ED.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".