MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2602175131 · doi:10.2527/asasmw.2017.12.227

227 Compensatory body protein gain in newly weaned pigs

2017· article· en· W2602175131 on OpenAlexaff
Adam D. Totafurno, Wilfredo D Mansilla, D. Wey, I. B. Mandell, C. F. M. de Lange

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStarterAnimal scienceWeaningBody weightLoinCompensatory growth (organ)BiologyWeight gainEndocrinologyFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of compensatory growth (CG) represents a means to improve nutrient utilization and decrease costs in pork production. While CG can occur following a period of amino acid intake restriction, there is limited work examining CG in newly weaned pigs. A serial slaughter study was conducted to determine effects of Lys restriction immediately following weaning on growth performance and carcass composition. 144 Duroc × Yorkshire × Landrace pigs (initial BW of 6.9 ± 0.21 kg) were randomly allocated to one of three dietary treatments (6 pens/treatment with 8 pigs/pen; 4 barrows, 4 gilts). For 3 wk (restriction phase), pigs were fed starter diets containing 110% (Control: 15.6 g/kg), 80% (Lys80: 11.3 g/kg), or 60% (Lys60: 8.5 g/kg) of NRC (2012) requirements for Lys. After the restriction phase, all pigs were fed a common grower diet containing 120% of NRC (2012) requirements for Lys (14.6 g/kg) for 6 wk (recovery phase). During the restriction phase, pig BW gain (P < 0.01; 411, 373, and 319 ± 7.5 g/d, respectively for Control, Lys80, Lys60) and G:F (P < 0.01; 0.807, 0.716, and 0.631 ± 0.0123, respectively) decreased linearly with decreasing dietary Lys levels. At end of the restriction phase, there was a significant linear decrease in BW with decreasing dietary Lys levels (P < 0.01; 15.5, 14.8, and 13.6 ± 0.37 kg, respectively). In addition, there was a linear decrease in carcass weight (P < 0.01; 11.6, 10.9, and 10.3 ± 0.30 kg, respectively) and carcass CP content (P < 0.01; 16.5, 16.1, and 15.3 ± 0.19%, respectively) with decreasing dietary Lys levels in pigs slaughtered at end of restriction phase. Following completion of the recovery phase there was a trend for a linear increase in BW gain (P = 0.06; 844, 862, and 905 ± 19.9 g/d, respectively) and a linear increase in G:F (P < 0.01; 0.529, 0.552, and 0.569 ± 0.0101, respectively) with decreasing dietary Lys levels. Carcass weight (P > 0.10; 40.5, 40.3, and 39.6 ± 0.80 kg, respectively) and carcass CP content (P > 0.10; 16.8, 17.4, and 17.1 ± 0.18%, respectively) were similar across dietary treatments in pigs slaughtered at end of recovery phase. At the end of the study, BW (average of 50.5 ± 0.63 kg) was similar (P > 0.10) across dietary treatments. In conclusion, newly weaned pigs previously fed a diet restricted in Lys for 3 wk, achieved full CG after a 6 wk recovery period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology→French-language works237,207→