Review of Patricia M. Locke and Rachel McCann, Eds. "Merleau-Ponty: Space, Place, Architecture"
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a well-known passage from "Eye and Mind," Maurice Merleau-Ponty argues that "I do not see [space] according to its exterior envelope; I live it from the inside; I am immersed in it.After all, the world is all around me, not in front of me" (Merleau-Ponty, "Eye" 178).What this means for him is that articulating space and light is no more "a question of speaking of space and light; the question is to make space and light, which are there, speak to us" (178).This is precisely what the papers collected in Merleau-Ponty: Space, Place, Architecture accomplish.By exploring Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of space in its relation to place, art, and architecture, each paper aims to "draw [us] back from the forgetfulness that makes us take being alive for granted, [and] reopen thought about human perception of and relation to how we remake and occupy the world around us" (Locke 1).By analyzing Merleau-Ponty's notions of depth, temporality, memory, and the flesh in their relation to architecture and lived experience, the authors unpack "the experience and expression of space on multiple levels" (1).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it