MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Curcumin for radiation dermatitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of 30 breast cancer patients.

2012· article· en· W2602475246 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julie L. Ryan, Charles E. Heckler, Marilyn N. Ling, Jacqueline P. Williams, Alice P. Pentland, Gary R. Morrow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemotherapy-related skin toxicity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerPlaceboErythemaRadiation therapyInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialCancerSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

9027 Background: Radiation dermatitis occurs in approximately 95% of patients receiving radiation therapy for cancer and often leads to pain and treatment delays. There is no standard treatment with demonstrated effectiveness for the prevention of radiation dermatitis. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-control clinical trial to assess the efficacy of curcumin, a potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory component of turmeric, to reduce radiation dermatitis in 30 breast cancer patients. Methods: Eligible patients included adult females with non-inflammatory breast cancer or carcinoma in situ prescribed radiation therapy without concurrent chemotherapy. After randomization, patients took four 500 mg capsules of curcumin or placebo three times daily throughout their course of radiation therapy (total daily dose = 6.0 g). Weekly assessments included Radiation Dermatitis Severity (RDS) Score, presence/absence of moist desquamation, erythema measure, and McGill Pain and Symptom Inventory (SI) questionnaires. Results: The 30 evaluable patients were white (90%; mean age = 58.1 years) with ER + PR + breast cancer (76.7%) who did not have total mastectomy (90%) or chemotherapy prior to start of radiation therapy (56.7%). No significant differences were observed between arms for demographics, compliance, erythema, pain, symptoms, or radiation skin dose. Standard pooled variances t-test showed that curcumin reduced RDS at end of treatment compared to placebo (mean RDS = 2.6 vs 3.4; p=0.008). Fisher’s exact test showed that curcumin significantly reduced the presence of moist desquamation at the end of radiation therapy (28.6% vs. 87.5 %; p=0.002). Repeated measures analysis confirmed divergence of RDS between curcumin and placebo arms at Week 5. Conclusions: Oral curcumin, 6.0 g daily during radiation therapy, reduced radiation dermatitis severity and moist desquamation in breast cancer patients. A multisite CCOP trial (N=700) is underway to confirm the effectiveness of curcumin to reduce radiation dermatitis severity during various radiation therapy regimens for breast cancer. Support: IND 75,444, Dermatology Foundation, KL2 RR024136, NCI PHS 1R25CA10618.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicChemotherapy-related skin toxicityFrench-language works237,207