MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2602806808 · doi:10.14740/cii.v2i1.28

Bronchoalveolar Wash: Proposal of a Cutting Point for Lactate Dehydrogenase in the Differential Diagnosis of Pulmonary Diseases

2017· article· en· W2602806808 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anabela Angeleri, Adriana Esther Rocher, Caracciolo Beatriz, Benjamin Barakian, Sandra Muzetti, Patrícia Vujacich, Luis Alberto Palaoro, Beatriz Perazzi

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infection and Immunity · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYouden's J statisticBronchoalveolar lavageLactate dehydrogenaseMedicineGastroenterologyPneumoniaInternal medicineTuberculosisDifferential diagnosisRespiratory diseaseReceiver operating characteristicPulmonary tuberculosisLungPathologyEnzymeBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is of great clinical utility in the diagnosis of pulmonary diseases (PDs). The cytological study (total and differential cell count) performed routinely in these samples, has a high orientative power and is diagnostic in some cases. The study of soluble substances has provided little information. This study aimed to determine the cut-off point of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in the diagnosis of different lung diseases. Methods: Two hundred forty-three BALs were selected from a total of 306 patients with a single respiratory disease: acute pneumonia due to common germs (NCG, n = 126), tuberculosis (TB, n = 20), mycotic pneumonia (MN, n = 12, N = 37) and interstitial diseases (IDs, n = 48). Cytological study and measurement of LDH activity were performed. The mean, standard deviation, sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp) and Youden index (YI) of this enzyme were determined. Student’s parametric and non-parametric Mann-Whitney tests were done (P < 0.05: significant). Results: Comparing the means and standard deviations of LDH in the different PDs, a significant increase of this parameter was observed in the NCG compared to the other PDs: NCG vs. TB (P = 0.003); MN, MD and ID (P < 0.0001). Based on these significant differences observed, the cut-off point for LDH in NCG was evaluated. Different values were analyzed: LDH: ≥ 150 IU/L with S: 70%, Sp: 85% and YI: 0.55; ≥ 130 IU/L with S: 77%, Sp: 80% and YI: 0.57; ≥ 120 IU/L with S: 80%, Sp: 77% and YI: 0.57 and ≥ 100 IU/L with S: 86%, Sp: 74% and YI: 0.60. Conclusions: It is proposed to perform the measurement of LDH activity for the differential diagnosis of NCG in the PD, since its mean value was significantly higher than the rest of the PD, using a cut-off point of LDH ≥ 100 IU/L; it showed a higher S and YI for the diagnosis of NCG screening. Increased LDH activity in NCG could be associated with the high number of leukocytes present in this pathology, superior to the rest of the PD. Measurement of LDH activity along with cell count would contribute to the diagnosis of PD. Clin Infect Immun. 2017;2(1):1-4 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cii60e

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infection and ImmunitySame topicInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207