MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603001427 · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aa6a99

Multi-isotope SPECT imaging of the<sup>225</sup>Ac decay chain: feasibility studies

2017· article· en· W2603001427 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew K. H. Robertson, Caterina F. Ramogida, Cristina Rodríguez‐Rodríguez, Stephan Blinder, P. Kunz, Vesna Sossi, Paul Schaffer

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTRIUMF
KeywordsCollimatorImaging phantomRodScannerMaterials scienceImage resolutionNuclear medicineOpticsImage qualityPhysicsIsotopeComputer scienceNuclear physicsImage (mathematics)MedicineArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effective use of the [Formula: see text] decay chain in targeted internal radioimmunotherapy requires the retention of both [Formula: see text] and progeny isotopes at the target site. Imaging-based pharmacokinetic tests of these pharmaceuticals must therefore separately yet simultaneously image multiple isotopes that may not be colocalized despite being part of the same decay chain. This work presents feasibility studies demonstrating the ability of a microSPECT/CT scanner equipped with a high energy collimator to simultaneously image two components of the [Formula: see text] decay chain: [Formula: see text] (218 keV) and [Formula: see text] (440 keV). Image quality phantoms were used to assess the performance of two collimators for simultaneous [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] imaging in terms of contrast and noise. A hotrod resolution phantom containing clusters of thin rods with diameters ranging between 0.85 and 1.70 mm was used to assess resolution. To demonstrate ability to simultaneously image dynamic [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] activity distributions, a phantom containing a [Formula: see text] generator from [Formula: see text] was imaged. These tests were performed with two collimators, a high-energy ultra-high resolution (HEUHR) collimator and an ultra-high sensitivity (UHS) collimator. Values consistent with activity concentrations determined independently via gamma spectroscopy were observed in high activity regions of the images. In hotrod phantom images, the HEUHR collimator resolved all rods for both [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] images. With the UHS collimator, no rods were resolvable in [Formula: see text] images and only rods ⩾1.3 mm were resolved in [Formula: see text] images. After eluting the [Formula: see text] generator, images accurately visualized the reestablishment of transient equilibrium of the [Formula: see text] decay chain. The feasibility of evaluating the pharmacokinetics of the [Formula: see text] decay chain in vivo has been demonstrated. This presented method requires the use of a high-performance high-energy collimator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.429
GPT teacher head0.508
Teacher spread0.079 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and BiologySame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207