MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W26031136 · doi:10.1096/fasebj.20.4.a112-b

Expression and characterization of soluble transferrin receptor in BHK cells: effect of mutations at the three asparagine glycosylation sites

2006· article· en· W26031136 on OpenAlexaff
Shaina L. Byrne, Rachael Leverence, Igor A. Kaltashov, Joshua S. Klein, Anthony M. Giannetti, Valerie C. Smith, Ross T. A. MacGillivray, Anne B. Mason

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIron Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersU.S. Public Health Service
KeywordsTransferrin receptorMutantTransferrinChemistryGlycosylationBaby hamster kidney cellAsparagineEndocytosisBiochemistryMutationReceptorPoint mutationMolecular biologyCellAmino acidBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transferrin (TF) is a bilobal iron transport protein that specifically binds to receptors (TFR) on the cell surface and delivers iron to cells by a process involving receptor mediated endocytosis and a pH change. The TF binding portion of the TFR (residues 121–760) containing a hexa‐His tag has been expressed by baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells as a secreted entity. TFR has three Asn linked glycosylation sites at position 251, 317 and 727. To prevent glycosylation at each site, three single point mutants in which Asn is mutated to Asp have been constructed. For wild type (WT), N251D and N727D TFR a maximum of 40 mg/L is produced, whereas maximum production of the N317D TFR mutant is considerably lower. Characterization of the WT and the mutant TFR constructs includes analysis by mass spectrometry and estimation of binding constants for interaction with diferric TF, monoferric TF C‐lobe (Fe C ‐TF) and a Fe C ‐TF mutant. Additionally the rate of iron release from Fe C ‐TF in the presence and absence of the various TFR constructs has been determined. The N317D TFR mutant binds more weakly to Fe C ‐TF and shows a reduced ability to stimulate the release of iron from Fe C ‐TF at pH 5.6 compared to WT TFR and the other two mutants. A structural basis for these findings is presented. This work was supported by USPHS Grant R01 DK 21739 (ABM) and R01 GM061666 (IAK).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicIron Metabolism and Disorders→French-language works237,207→