MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603188193 · doi:10.1353/mou.2003.0022

Kommos: An Excavation on the South Coast of Crete. Volume IV: The Greek Sanctuary ed. by Joseph W. Shaw and Maria C. Shaw (review)

2003· article· en· W2603188193 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Leslie Day

Bibliographic record

VenueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS JOSEPH W. SHAW and MARIA C. SHAW, eds. Kommos: An Excavation on the South Coast of Crete. Volume N: The Greek Sanctuary. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000. Pp. xvi + 813; 705 photos, 214 line illustrations. US $235.00. ISBN 0-691- 0 5080-5. This volume on the Greek sanctuary is a welcome addition to the series of publications on the excavations at Kommos. Crete. conducted by Joseph and Maria Shaw and sponsored by the University of Toronto and the Royal Ontario Museum. Much of the long and complex history of Kommos has been presented in three previous volumes that have dealt with aspects of the Bronze Age settlement. Subsequent volumes will treat the civic buildings explored in a more recent program of excavation . The editors have wisely chosen to present separately the findings from the Greek sanctuary. for the material represents a new culture and a new type of site. with little continuity from the Bronze Age settlement that preceded it. This volume presents in enormous detail a coherent account of activity at a Greek rural sanctuary in use between the eleventh century B.C. and the second century A.D. (although there was a hiatus between the sixth and fourth centuries B.C.. and the site was largely out of use after 50 B.C.). It is an invaluable contribution to classical archaeology. The volume is in two fascicules. one of text and the other of plates. a somewhat cumbersome arrangement. but one that the wealth of material and the depth of the presentation demand. Although a variety of specialists have written the text. it is well edited. both in terms of the clarity of presentation (with specialist jargon kept to a minimum) and in terms of consistency. Given the number of authors. this is a great achievement and is in keeping with the high quality of the other volumes in the series. This reviewer noted only one major inconsistency. that in the spelling of Nicolas (or Nicholas) Coldstream's name. As with other volumes in the series. the quality of the drawings and photographs is high. Separate chapters by various specialists present the findings. First 2°3 204 BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS Joseph Shaw gives a lucid description and analysis of the architecture and stratigraphy of the sanctuary by periods. Although he focuses on the successive temples and their respective altars, he also describes the associated buildings and the dumps. There are many clear and meticulous architectural drawings, elevations, and sections, including useful phase plans, and the photographs chosen to accompany them clearly show the features discussed in the text, with labels added directly to the photos for additional clarification. The Iron Age inscriptions are discussed by Eric Csapo, Alan W. Johnston, and Daniel Geagan. The epigraphical material ranges from crudely incised marks to full-fledged stone inscriptions, and the inscriptions are arranged in the catalogue by period and medium (ceramic and stone), and within each period/medium by type (proprietary, dedicatory . and commercial). The evidence presented is of particular importance for illuminating the development of the Greek alphabet and answering questions about early Greek literacy. Maria Shaw presents an analysis of the sculpture from the sanctuary area, from the votive figurines of the earliest sanctuary to the large stone sculpture that may belong to the Roman Period. Most of the material consists of terracotta and bronze animal figurines, and the analysis includes speculation on the function of these figurines within the context of the early Iron Age temples. The fine chapter on the pottery is divided up into chronological periods , with discussions and catalogues of key deposits. The majority of the Early Iron Age and Hellenistic material is treated by Peter Callaghan , who began the analysis, and Alan Johnston, who completed it. Patricia Bikai discusses the imported Phoenician pottery, an important body of material in this site, and appendices present a chemical analysis of the Phoenician pottery by Richard Jones. John Hayes discusses with great expertise the later Roman material, including both pottery and lamps. A long chapter on the miscellaneous finds provides catalogues and discussions of each type of find, including the following: Roman glass (John Hayes); coins (Alan Walker); jewelry...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of CanadaSame topicMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207