MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603247028

Colour Dipole Cascades

2016· article· en· W2603247028 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLund University Publications (Lund University) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicColor Science and Applications
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersNuclear PhysicsDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoRegione CalabriaMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaHungarian Scientific Research FundAgence Nationale de la RechercheConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaU.S. Department of EnergyEuropean CommissionAbdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical PhysicsRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scientists and students from all countries which are members of the United Nations, UNESCO or IAEA may attend the Workshop.As it will be conducted in English, participants should have an adequate working knowledge of that language.As a rule, travel and subsistence expenses of the participants should be borne by the home institution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it