MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The incidence and clinical impact of bone metastases in non-small cell lung cancer.

2013· article· en· W2603380120 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Kuchuk, Iryna Kuchuk, Brian Hutton, Mark Clemons, Paul Wheatley‐Price

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineLung cancerIncidence (geometry)OncologyPopulationGastroenterologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e19024 Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading global cause of cancer death. Bone metastases (BM) in NSCLC are a common cause of morbidity, but use of bone targeted agents (BTA) is variable. We investigated the incidence and impact of BM in an unselected NSCLC population. Methods: With ethics approval, we performed a retrospective chart review of all patients (pts) with NSCLC seen at our institution in 2007. Baseline demographics, stage and initial treatment goals were recorded. In pts with advanced disease (mNSCLC) metastatic sites were identified. In BM pts, skeletal related events (SRE), interventions and outcomes were recorded. Results: In total, 374 pts were identified. Median age was 68 years (IQR 60-76), 54% female. Histological subtypes were adenocarcinoma (36%), squamous (18%), and other (46%). Overall 91% were current or ex-smokers. At initial diagnosis 37% had stage I-IIIa, 18% IIIb and 46% stage IV disease. A total of 160 pts (43%) were treated with curative intent; 211 (56%) were considered palliative. Of the 160 curative therapy pts, 90 (56%) subsequently relapsed, with a median time from diagnosis to relapse of 14.9 months. Of the 301 pts with mNSCLC, common sites of metastasis were lung/pleura (80%), mediastinal lymph nodes (69%), bone (39%), brain (30%), and liver (24%). In total 116 pts had BM; a higher incidence was observed in pts ≤70 years than pts >70 (36% vs 23%). SREs were observed in 69 pts (59%), the median number of SREs per BM pt was 1 (0-16). The incidence of SREs was radiotherapy (63%), fractures (22%), spinal cord compression (6%) and surgery to bone (5%). Factors associated with ≥2 SREs were smoking status (28% never smokers vs 9% ex/current smoker) and younger age (15% vs 5%). In BM pts, 64% required opioid analgesia, only 6% received BTA. Overall survival (OS) in pts with mNSCLC was 7.3 months (IQR 3.1-20.5). Pts with BM had significantly shorter OS compared to those without BM (5.5 vs. 9.9 months, p=0.02). Median OS in pts with or without SRE were 5.5 and 6.4 months (p=0.58). Conclusions: BM in NSCLC pts are common, and most pts will develop an SRE and/or require opioids. In mNSCLC, the presence of BM is associated with significantly shorter survival, which raises challenging questions around the use of BTA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.502
Teacher spread0.418 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207