Predicting children's perceptions of physical activity adequacy and predilection from physical measures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is growing interest in ensuring that children develop fundamental movement skills to enable participation in different forms of physical activity throughout the lifespan. Beyond physical skills required for participation, the importance of a child's perceptions of their own ability for sustained involvement cannot be overlooked. There is currently little evidence to explain how a child's physical abilities relate to their perceived adequacy and predilection for physical activity. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between children's physical competence and their perceived adequacy and predilection for physical activity. This study included 341 participants (50% female) from Prince Edward Island who were assessed using the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy protocol (8-12 years old (M = 10.7; SD = 1.1)). Perceptions of adequacy and predilection were measured with the CSAPPA questionnaire (Hay, 1992), and were predicted using different demographic (age, sex) and physical (BMI, plank, sit and reach, handgrip, PACER run, fundamental movement skills using an obstacle course) characteristics. Stepwise multiple regressions determined that the PACER run score, obstacle course score, age, and BMI were significant predictors of children's adequacy (r2 = 22.3%). Alternatively, predilection was predicted by the PACER run score and obstacle course score (r2 = 16.0%). Our results highlight the salience of a child's ability to run and complete fundamental movement skills with regard to their perceived adequacy and predilection to participate in physical activity. Results will be discussed in light of engaging children in play and developing skills that promote long-term participation.Acknowledgments: Research funding was provided by the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute through the RBC Learn to Play project, delivered in partnership with ParticipACTION and the Public Health Agency of Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".