Role of 17-Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate as an Adjuvant Therapy in Women With Cervical Cerclage for Prevention of Preterm Delivery: A Retrospective Matched Controlled Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: We aimed to evaluate the role of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHP) as an adjuvant therapy with cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study from July 2010 to December 2014 on patients who received 17-OHP with cervical cerclage (group 1). This group was compared to matched control patients who had cervical cerclage only (group 2). The maternal and fetal outcomes were compared between the two groups. All data were collected using SPSS ® Mac version 23. Results: A total of 122 singleton pregnant women with cervical cerclage were observed; among them, 64 patients used 17-OHP with cerclage, and 58 patients received cerclage only. Our analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the outcome between the two groups. Characteristics compared in both groups such as cervical length, miscarriage rates, gestational age at time of delivery, mode of delivery, and other variables did not meet any statistical significance. Preterm outcome at 37, above 37, and below 37 weeks, was similar in both groups. In fetal outcome, the only statistical difference was the Apgar score of neonates at 1 min that was better in group 1 (P = 0.04), but at 5 min, the Apgar score did not show any difference (P = 0.7). Conclusions: In our study, we found no additional benefits of adjuvant 17-OHP on maternal, fetal outcome, or preterm delivery outcome in comparison to cervical cerclage alone. More prospective randomized studies are recommended to further investigate this matter. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2017;6(1):12-16 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo422w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".