MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603487315

Professional-personal-private boundaries in a Supervisor - PhD student relationship - The influence of cultural backgrounds

2013· article· en· W2603487315 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fredrik Ödegaard, Irene Rodríguez Meizoso, Kostas Selviaridis, Jacob S. Christiansen, Jan Erik Solem

Bibliographic record

VenueProject and Conference Reports - Genombrottet, LTH · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDoctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupervisorContext (archaeology)Public relationsPsychologyProfessional developmentSociologySocial psychologyPedagogyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In any job that requires contact with people, there is a need to find a “healthy” balance between professional and personal life in order to function at work. In a way, the PhD student-supervisor  case  is  not  different  from  such  jobs.  As  stated  in  a  recently published article, “Because of the delicacy and complex power dynamics, supervisor- student relationships need clearly defined boundaries.”   The  requirements  and  understanding  of  where  that  balanced  line  or  boundary  lays might depend on the individual person, but those differences seem to be milder within a  particular  culture.  In  this  sense,  the  PhD  student-supervisor  situation  might  be  an extreme case due to the often multicultural environment of an international university. There  is  very  little  information  in  the  Internet  about  specific  boundaries  between professional-personal-private  life  in  a  PhD  student-supervisor  context.  Some information  about  how  these  boundaries  differ  between  cultural  backgrounds  or nationalities  can  be  found  in  the  “Guide  to  mentoring  graduate  students  across cultures” developed by the Western Teaching Support Centre, University of Western Ontario,  Canada. 2  This  handbook  highlights  general  differences  in  personal- professional  boundaries  among  different  nationalities.  For  example,  while  in  North America people distinguish between work friends and personal friends and socialize separately, students from Central America and Mexico expect supervisors to take care of them as part of an “extended family”. A parental supervision style is also expected among Chinese students, who find it appropriate to ask for a loan or to borrow the supervisor´s  car.  In  return,  these  students  show  firm  dedication  to  the  supervisor´s work. In our work, we decided to conduct interviews with the aim to explore how specific boundaries might change for people, with a special focus on the cultural background of the interviewees. For this purpose we have developed two parallel questionnaires, one directed to graduate students and the other one directed to supervisors, to try to figure out if there were any changes in such boundaries regarding nationalities, gender, age  and  years  of  experience.  The  questions  have  focused  in  six  different  criteria, named  1-personal  relationships,  2-dual  relationships,  3-political  view,  4-personal favors, 5-  financial  situation,  6-health.  For  each  criterion,  an  open  question  and  a yes/no question were asked. The latter was done to be able to quantify some of the answers.  We  have  interviewed  11  supervisors  (9  Swedes,  2  Non  Swedes)  and  14 graduate students (8 Swedes, 6 Non Swedes).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.213
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProject and Conference Reports - Genombrottet, LTHSame topicDoctoral Education Challenges and SolutionsFrench-language works237,207