MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603611363 · doi:10.15173/esr.v21i1.2529

MODELING OF EMISSION TRADING: A LITERATURE REVIEW FOR DYNAMIC PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM MODELS WITH PERFECT COMPETITION

2015· review· en· W2603611363 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vincent Bertrand

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Studies Review · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicClimate Change Policy and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmissions tradingPartial equilibriumEconomicsCompetition (biology)Marginal costMicroeconomicsEconometricsGeneral equilibrium theoryClimate changeEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reviews the literature of emission trading models in case of partial equilibrium with perfect competition. First, we introduce the economics of pollution control and the origins of emission trading. Second, we review the static models of permit market, investigating a number of factors that can affect the effectiveness of emission trading. Next, we present dynamic models, analyzing questions such as banking/borrowing, relationship between spot and future markets, exogenous factors influencing the marginal abatement cost, etc. We end with recent studies that model the main features of the European Emission Trading Scheme in a dynamic framework with stochastic emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.273
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.092 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy Studies ReviewSame topicClimate Change Policy and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207