MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603714697 · doi:10.5860/choice.191012

Homegrown terror: Benedict Arnold and the burning of New London

2015· article· en· W2603714697 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueChoice Reviews Online · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Homegrown Terror: Benedict Arnold and the Burning of New London. Eric D. Lehman. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 2014. 261 pages. $30.00 (hardcover).Most Americans are familiar with the name Benedict Arnold and instantly associate it with the word treason. We may know that he turned traitor during the Revolutionary War in a plot involving West Point but, for most of us, that is the end of the story. Homegrown Terror corrects this knowledge gap by recounting Arnold's wartime exploits both before and after his notorious volte-face. The book convincingly levels the additional charge of domestic terrorism against Arnold and leaves little doubt that his name will remain forever infamous. This is not a revisionist history. If anything, it represents a well-deserved piling of additional charges that have been lost, and now revived, to general knowledge and to history.The story of Benedict Arnold is akin to Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Before the war he was an affluent merchant in Norwich, Connecticut, with family and commercial ties to New London. An early Son of Liberty, during the war he participated in many battles, distinguishing himself as a legitimate hero in the effort to gain independence from Britain. He and Ethan Allen captured Fort Ticonderoga without firing a shot. He led the disastrous attack upon Quebec, which was doomed to failure anyway due to poor planning and logistics and unrealistic expectations. Ironically, he was also instrumental in beating back an early British attack on Connecticut. Arnold was the real hero of the pivotal Battle of Saratoga, though his commanding officer, Horatio Gates, gained most of the laurels.Throughout his career, early warning signs ofa difficult and prickly personality emerged. He was arrested for assaulting a Loyalist before the war began. He repeatedly threatened to resign when he did not receive promotions fast enough to keep pace with his ambition. On the personal side, he became deeply indebted and married a beautiful Tory from an affluent family. As military governor of Pennsylvania, he was known as a hothead and was charged with misconduct and peculation (embezzlement). He resigned this post, was court-martialed and acquitted, and was reprimanded by Washington. This led to his fateful correspondence with the British and the eventual betrayal of his friends, family, and country.Arnold was offered a British generalship and twenty thousand pounds to turn West Point over to his former enemies. If the conspiracy had not been discovered, it is not unreasonable to believe that the entire course of the Revolutionary War may have been upended. Control of the Hudson was considered vital to the war on both sides, analogous to control of the Mississippi River during the Civil War. Of course, the conspiracy was discovered and disaster averted, but Arnold would exact his revenge in two distinctive campaigns. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChoice Reviews OnlineSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207