Imaging Findings Suggestive of Axial Spondyloarthritis in Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) patients and to assess the proportion of DISH patients whose MRI findings would fulfill the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria for a positive MRI of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). METHODS: This study involved all DISH patients who had a spine or sacroiliac (SI) joint MRI performed between January 2009 and December 2014. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected. Available radiographs and MRI were analyzed and blindly scored by an experienced reader, using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) scores for both spine and SI joint MRI. RESULTS: A total of 53 symptomatic DISH patients was included in the analysis. The mean ± SD SPARCC score of the spine was 18.3 ± 23.4. Thirty-five patients (67.3%) had at least 1 fatty corner. Thirty patients (57.7%) met the ASAS definition of a spine MRI suggestive of axial SpA, but only 6 patients (15.8%) with an available SI joint MRI had sacroiliitis according to ASAS criteria. Only 1 patient (3.3%) had ≥3 erosions on the SI joint. CONCLUSION: Inflammatory lesions of the spine are common on the MRI of symptomatic DISH patients, and more than half fulfilled the ASAS criteria for a spine MRI suggestive of axial SpA. However, only a few patients met the ASAS definition of active sacroiliitis, suggesting that MRI of the SI joint but not of the spine might allow the differential diagnosis of DISH versus axial SpA in the elderly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".