Ciudades letradas posconcretas: conciencia tóxica en tres poetas posconcretos brasileños
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Una constante en la poesia de las vanguardias latinoamericanas y en el modernismo brasileno (Fervor de Buenos Aires de jorge Luis Borges, Urbe de Manuel Maples arce, Pauliceia Desvairada de Mario de andrade, etc.) es la ciudad, esta es tematizada y representada a traves de un nuevo lenguaje que la convierte en icono de la modernidad (como, por ejemplo, el celebre poema cidade de augusto de campos). asi, en el Brasil, durante el concretismo la ciudad se vuelve un simbolo de esperanza en un futuro mejor basado en el desarrollo urbano. en el momento posconcreto, tal optimismo se transforma, por el contrario, en dudas, escepticismo y hasta pesimismo en relacion tanto al lenguaje poetico, como al tema de la ciudad como generadora de una sociedad mas justa. Pobreza, violencia y desastre ecologico pueblan las ciudades de la poesia posconcreta de Haroldo de campos(“cubatao”), Frederico Barbosa (Contracorrente) y regis Bonvicino (Pagina Orfa), entre otros. el presente ensayo analiza los cambios en la representacion poetica de la ciudad y el surgimiento de una “conciencia toxica” en relacion al medio ambiente urbano en esos tres poetas del momento posconcreto
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".