L’engagement politique et militant de la Coalition pour l’équité salariale : analyse de la lutte de reconnaissance des emplois de proximité occupés par les femmes au Nouveau-Brunswick
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article propose une analyse critique des espaces d’engagement, dont ceux en lien avec l’engagement de proximite et l’engagement militant des femmes du Nouveau-Brunswick. Il s’agit de definir la notion d’engagement social afin de mieux saisir comment les femmes subissent dans certains espaces une invisibilisation. Pour mieux comprendre, une analyse de la presse du Nouveau-Brunswick portant sur la lutte militante de la Coalition sur l’equite salariale dans l’espace social et politique est presentee. Cette analyse permet de saisir comment l’engagement de proximite des femmes lie au travail traditionnellement feminin remunere est reconnu dans ces deux espaces. Abstract The article proposes a critical analysis of spaces of political engagement, particularly those of close engagement and of activist engagement among New Brunswick women. We define the notion of engagement in such a way as to better understand how women are experiencing an invisibilisation in certain spaces. To illustrate this we execute an analysis of the presentation in the social and political spaces by New Brunswick’s media of the activist struggle of the Coalition sur l’equite salariale (the Pay Equity Coalition). This analysis outlines how the close engagement of women about paid employment that is traditionally perceived as feminin labour is perceived in both these spaces. Keywords : Pay equity; social justice; appreciation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".