MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603729978

И др. Морфология возбудителя пурпурного церкоспороза сои и пути снижения его вредоносности

2015· article· ru· W2603729978 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ю В Положиева, Л. К. Дубовицкая, Evgeniia A. Semenova

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Protection and Quarantine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCzechCercosporaBiologyChinaPathogenGeographyLeaf spotBotanyArchaeologyLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article presents the materials on the molecular-genetic identification of the causative agent of the disease on soybeans in the Amur region, as view Cercospora kikuchii. The Described biological, morphological properties and symptoms defeat of various organs of soybean pathogen. Held the evaluation of lesions of seeds Cercospora kikuchii varieties of Russian varieties and 150 varieties and accessions in the VIR collection of different origins observed that the most prevalent disease has been on the sorts of Bylina (28 %), Maleta (6,8 %), there are no signs of defeat in the varieties Rosinka, Lada and varieties from the Czech Republic, Canada, USA, Poland, Germany, Sweden, Slovakia, Austria, France, Hungary, Yugoslavia, China, Ukraine, Japan, vegetation period up to 120 days. Evaluated the effectiveness of drugs against the pathogen. The best results were observed when using drugs Maxim, Fitosporin-M, Zerebra Agro, Fertigrain Start, Fertigrain foliar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant Protection and QuarantineSame topicSoybean genetics and cultivationFrench-language works237,207