MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603877714 · doi:10.2527/asasmw.2017.285

285 Effects of prebiotic or organic acid supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and plasma cytokines of weaned pigs housed under poor sanitary conditions

2017· article· en· W2603877714 on OpenAlexaff
Bich Van Le Thanh, John K Htoo, L. F. Wang, R. T. Zijlstra

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrebioticNutrientAnimal scienceFood scienceBiologyOrganic acidChemistryBiochemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Weaning causes changes in intestinal functions that may induce postweaning diarrhea (PWD) in newly weaned pigs. Dietary supplementation of feed additives such as prebiotics or organic acids may reduce PWD and was evaluated in 160 pigs (7.6 ± 0.9 kg BW) that were weaned at 20 d of age and housed in pens with 4 pigs. Pigs were housed under poor sanitary conditions created by spreading pooled feces from the sow herd in pens 1 d before and 1 wk after pigs were placed into pens that were not cleaned prior to or during the entire study. Diets were formulated without antibiotics and growth promoters to provide 2.42 Mcal NE/kg, 5.18 g standardized ileal digestible (SID) Lys/Mcal NE, and 21.7% CP. One week after weaning, pens blocked by areas in rooms were randomly assigned for 3 wk to 5 test diets: 1 basal diet (negative control) containing corn, wheat, canola meal, and soybean meal and 4 test diets formulated by adding 1 of the following feed additives to the basal diet: β-glucan + Zn (0.02 and 0.05%), 0.25% mannan oligosaccharides (MOS), and 1.20% potassium diformate (HCO2K [KdiF]). Data were analyzed as a randomized complete block using the mixed procedure with test diet as the fixed term and block as the random term. Following the trial start, PWD (measured as % d within wk of diarrhea incidence) increased (P < 0.001; time effect) and then declined (23, 52, and 28% for wk 1, 2, and 3, respectively) but did not differ among diets. Supplementation of KdiF increased (P < 0.05) ADG by 13%, final BW by 8.5%, apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of DM, CP, and GE by 3%, and predicted dietary NE value by 4% compared with the control. Supplementation of β-glucan + Zn tended to increase (P < 0.10) G:F by 11% during wk 1 and increased (P < 0.05) ATTD of DM, CP, and GE by 3% and predicted dietary NE value by 3% compared with the control. Supplementation of MOS did not affect performance, ATTD of nutrients, or predicted dietary NE value. Supplementation of β-glucan + Zn, MOS, and KdiF did not affect plasma IFN-γ and IL-1β. In conclusion, KdiF enhanced growth performance and nutrient digestibility, β-glucan + Zn enhanced nutrient digestibility but did not affect growth, and MOS did not affect any variable. Although not affecting PWD in weaned pigs housed under poor sanitary conditions, dietary supplementation of organic acid increased nutrient digestion and enhanced growth whereas dietary prebiotics did not.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207