Refinement of the Crystal Structure of Schneiderhöhnite
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The crystal structure of schneiderhohnite, Fe2+Fe3+3As3+5O13, triclinic P ![Graphic][1] , a 8.945(3), b 10.022(3), c 9.161(4) A, α 62.942(5), β 116.072(6), γ 81.722(6)°, has been refined to an R 1 value of 1.4%. The structure is very close to that reported by [Hawthorne (1985)][2], but detailed examination of the structural connectivity shows that schneiderhohnite is better described as a sheet structure than as a framework structure. Zig-zag chains of edge-sharing Fe (1), Fe (2), Fe (3) (= Fe3+) octahedra extend parallel to the c axis, and these chains are cross-linked into a corrugated sheet by tetramers of edge-sharing Fe (4) (= Fe3+) and Fe (5) (= Fe2+) octahedra. (As3+O3) triangular pyramids decorate the surface of this sheet of octahedra as single (AsO3) groups, with all three short bonds linked to anion vertices of the octahedra, and as two crystallographically distinct [As2O5] dimers with four short bonds (two from each As3+) to octahedron vertices. The sheets are connected along [100] via the bridging anion of one of the two [As2O5] dimers that bonds to an Fe2+ octahedron of the adjacent sheet, imparting a strong sheet-like character to the structure and accounting for the perfect (100) cleavage. [1]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif [2]: #ref-6
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it