MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B40: [10]-gingerol as a pro-apoptotic molecule in triple negative breast cancer

2017· article· en· W2604119850 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ana Carolina Baptista Moreno Martin, Rebeka Tomasin, Amanda Blanque Becceneri, Angelina Maria Fuzer, Márcia R. Cominetti

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicGinger and Zingiberaceae research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriple-negative breast cancerBreast cancerCancer researchMetastasisCancerApoptosisIn vivoCell cycleCancer cellBiologyMedicineInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The aim of this work was to study the pro-apoptotic effects of [10]-gingerol and connect them to anti-tumor and anti-metastatic activities in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines and in an spontaneous triple negative breast cancer model in vivo. Breast cancer has the highest incidence among women and metastasis is the major cause of death in cancer. TNBC affects 20% of women with breast cancer. This cancer type is very aggressive and has a high propensity to form lung and brain metastases. Nowadays, there is no effective treatment for TNBC and therefore, new therapies are required. Studies to discovery new molecules to be used in more efficient treatments for this disease are essential. Molecules that can interfere with cell proliferation, migration, invasion, apoptosis and cell cycle can be used as a model or tools to develop new anti-metastatic drugs. Epidemiologic studies have shown that Asian populations have lower incidence of breast cancer comparing to western populations. This has been attributed in part to differences in dietary habits. In particular, gingerols, natural compounds extracted from ginger rhizomes, have been shown to present anti-cancer properties against various tumor cell types in vitro and in vivo. MTT assay was performed to verify the inhibitory effects of [10]-gingerol on cell proliferation. To investigate [10]-gingerol mechanisms of action, apoptosis, cell cycle assays and TUNEL (Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling) were performed. For the in vivo data an spontaneous model of breast cancer metastasis was used. Results: [10]-gingerol was able to inhibit cell proliferation in different cell lines. In the murine cell line (4T1Br4), [10]-gingerol induced apoptosis, cell cycle arrest at sub-G0 phase and also induced DNA damage demonstrated by TUNEL assay, therefore interfering with DNA and provoking its damage. [10]-gingerol inhibited lung, bone and brain metastases in an intra-mammary fat pad spontaneous breast cancer model. Conclusion: [10]-gingerol showed to be a non-toxic compound with anti-proliferative and DNA damaging effects, inducing cell apoptosis in vitro and also inhibiting lung, bone and brain metastases in a spontaneous TNBC model in vivo. Patent deposit: BR 10 2015 024093 7. Approved by ethical committee – E507 and 3224-1. Citation Format: Ana Carolina B. M. Martin, Rebeka Tomasin, Amanda Blanque Becceneri, Angelina Fuzer, Paulo Cezar Vieira, Marcia Regina Cominetti. [10]-gingerol as a pro-apoptotic molecule in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on DNA Repair: Tumor Development and Therapeutic Response; 2016 Nov 2-5; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2017;15(4_Suppl):Abstract nr B40.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.245
GPT teacher head0.569
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer ResearchSame topicGinger and Zingiberaceae researchFrench-language works237,207