Constraining a 3D anisotropic tomography inversion with 800 wells – A Canadian oil sands case history
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This Canadian oil-sands case history is a very shallow play with a complex geology that includes Quaternary thrusting at surface, sinkholes, and highly karsted Devonian carbonates at the base of the notoriously complex McMurray reservoir. Despite this challenging environment, we were able to demonstrate that Depth Imaging brought significant improvements as compared to the routinely used time imaging. Recent developments in Anisotropic Pre-Stack Depth Imaging technologies provided a better focused and better positioned 3D subsurface image that accurately tied several hundreds of wells. These results were achieved using steering filters, solver bounds and simultaneous multi-parameter tomography inversion while constraining the tomography updates with the well top picks from over 800 wells. Surveys of different vintages, geometries, orientations and shooting directions were regularized using 5D interpolation and merged together. Besides a better imaging of the subsurface, one of main objective of the project was the characterization of the McMurray reservoir. To that aim, the Anisotropic Pre-Stack Depth Migration (APSDM) generated better conditioned Offset Vector Tile gathers for subsequent pre-stack inversion work. The Alberta oil sands are one of the largest bituminous hydrocarbon reserves in the world (Alberta Energy Regulator, 2015). At reservoir temperature, the bitumen is so viscous that it can almost be considered as a solid. In situ thermal recovery processes such as steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) that lower viscosity and increase mobility are required to extract the bitumen from the reservoir. SAGD operations consist of horizontal well pairs that are drilled into the base of the reservoir. In each pair, one well is drilled about 5 m directly above the other well. The top well is injected with steam to melt the bitumen. The bitumen seeps down towards the bottom producing well, which pumps the bitumen to the surface. The well pairs are generally configured to about ten parallel horizontal well pairs that are around 100 m apart horizontally and are 1000 m long, which constitute a 1-km2 pad.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".