MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2604275339 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2016-0847

Experimental and quantum chemical studies on the structure and vibrational spectra of cearoin (a neoflavonoid)

2017· article· en· W2604275339 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shweta Shweta, Eram Khan, Poonam Tandon, Purnima Bharti, Padam Kumar, Rakesh Maurya

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNonlinear Optical Materials Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoleculeDelocalized electronNatural bond orbitalHOMO/LUMOChemical physicsPhysicsComputational chemistryReactivity (psychology)Chemical bondAtoms in moleculesChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present investigation, the natural product cearoin is studied by both experimental and theoretical methods. It is classified as a family of neoflavonoid and is widely used as a local anti-inflammatory, antibiotic, and antiallergic substance. To obtain detailed information about the discussed molecule, a number of experiments have been performed by various techniques including infrared, Raman, and ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy. Quantum chemical calculations were also performed for a clear interpretation and analysis of the results. HOMO–LUMO energy band gap gives a valuable understanding of the reactivity and some of the structural and physical properties of the theme molecule. Molecular electrostatic potential surface, global and local reactivity descriptors are used to study the chemical reactivity of the molecule. Natural bond orbital analysis is followed to figure out the stability of the molecule arising from hyperconjugative interactions and charge delocalization. As cearoin is utilized as an antibiotic material, molecular docking simulations have also been done on bacterial proteins to investigate the ligand–protein interaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicNonlinear Optical Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207