Historical changes in the geomorphology of the Ottawa River (NW Ohio, U.S.A.) due to urbanization and land clearance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In northwestern Ohio, the impact of humans on natural systems extends back hundreds of years as manifested by complete reorganization of fluvial systems.This study addressed historical changes in the geomorphology the Ottawa River using vibracores, trenches, textural and geochemical analyses, and 14 C and blue light optically stimulated luminescence (blue OSL) dating.The total section thickness from trenching and vibracoring is approximately 4.5-m.The oldest sediment in the cores is interbedded massive sands and silts >1.5-m thick.These deposits represent a point bar succession that is likely post-glacial in origin.Overlying the sand is 75-cm thick interval of peats and organic-rich carbonaceous muds interbedded with thin sand horizons.Several 14 C analyses from this interval have calibrated ages of 4889 +/-178 YBP, 4731 +/-306 YBP, and 4547 +/-326 YBP.These deposits are interpreted as hydromorphic paleosols and overbank flood deposits that formed following the rise of Lake Erie.An interval 33-cm to 68-cm thick overlies the paleosols and consists of alternating massive or cross-bedded sands interbedded with discontinuous silts.One blue OSL date from these sands produced an age of 231 +/-15 YBP, which approaches the age of land clearance in northwest Ohio (early-1800s).This interval is interpreted as channel and channel margin deposits.Further up section, a cross-bedded sand layer, dated at -4 +/-5 YBP and -9 +/-5 YBP, corresponds with a major flood that occurred in this region during 1959.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".