Amine‐functionalized CuBTC/poly(ether‐b‐amide‐6) (Pebax<sup>®</sup> MH 1657) mixed matrix membranes for CO<sub>2</sub>/CH<sub>4</sub> separation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract CuBTC and NH2‐CuBTC metal organic frameworks (MOF) were used to produce mixed matrix membranes (MMM) with a block copolymer of poly(ether‐b‐amide‐6) (Pebax® MH 1657) as the polymer matrix to investigate the effect of amine functionalized group (–NH2) on the CO2/CH4 gas separation performance of the MMM. The MOF were fully characterized by XRD, FTIR‐ATR, TGA, N2, CO2, and CH4 adsorption, while the MMM were characterized using FTIR‐ATR, TGA, DSC, and SEM. Permeability and selectivity of the MMM were studied at different MOF mass contents (5 to 20 g/g) and feed pressures (0.3 to 1.5 MPa) for pure and mixed gases. The CO2 permeability for 20 g/g of both Pebax/CuBTC and Pebax/NH2‐CuBTC MMMs was nearly twice that of the neat polymeric membrane, while the presence of amine functionalized group in NH2‐CuBTC produced an increasing trend of CO2/CH4 ideal selectivity at high NH2‐CuBTC loading and about a 60 % increase was observed at 20 g/g of NH2‐CuBTC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".