Electrochemical Reduction of Molybdenium Compounds to Form Molybdenium Powder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molybdenum (Mo) is a refractory metal and mostly used as an alloying agent in cast iron, steels and superalloys to enhance hardenability, strength, toughness and corrosion resistance. It also finds other uses either in the form of a pure metal or an element in, for example, lubricants and catalysts. Traditional metal production methods are not suitable for molybdenum because pure molybdenum has very high melting point and has a tendency to get oxidized at low temperatures. Hydrogen reduction of molybdenum oxide is a very common way for Mo production but, it has two stages during process. At the second stage, the reduction process needs very high temperatures, therefore, high energy consumption and special equipment requirement is essential. FFC Cambridge process [1] based on electrochemical reduction of solid compounds was considered as an alternative way to produce molybdenum at relatively low temperatures. Similar to reduction of WO3 [2], loss of molybdenum as molybdenum oxychloride from MoO3 in CaCl2 containing molten salts is inevitable [3]. MoS2 powder pressed and sintered at 400oC to form pellets were used as starting material for electrochemical formation of pure Mo in molten CaCl2-NaCl salt mixture under argon gas at 800oC. A constant voltage in the range 1 to 3.0V was applied between MoS2 cathode and graphite anode. When the process was terminated at a prescribed time, the cathode was removed from the molten salt, cooled in argon, washed with water in air to dissolve the solidified salt, and then dried at about 100oC in vacuum before further analysis employing XRD, SEM and EDS. [1] G.Z. Chen, D. J. Fray, T. W. Farthing, Direct Electrochemical Reduction of Titanium Dioxide to Titanium in Molten Calcium Chloride, Nature, 407 (2000), 361-364. [2] M. Erdoğan, İ. Karakaya, Electrochemical Reduction of Tungsten Compounds to Produce Tungsten Powder, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 41B (2010), 798-804. [3] W.T. Thompson, C.W. Bale, and A.D. Pelton: Facility for the Analysis of Chemical Thermodynamics (FACT), McGill University Montreal, Royal Military College of Canada in Kingston, E´cole Polytechnique, Montreal, Canada, 1985.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".